hui916 | 2011-01-10 18:17 |
梁生自九十代初開始已被委任為教育統籌委員會主席, 整個香港教育制度的改革, 這二十年來香港教育系統的翻天覆地, 包括三三四, 都是他一手策劃出來. 雖然他脫離了公職, 但他對教育可能仍然有情意結, 所以想給三個子女試不同學校, 體驗一下不同的風格及教學模式. 他大女在Co-ed, 大仔去DBS, 二仔會去邊間呢? 會不會去他母校英華, 或且試一下國際學校. |
hui916 | 2011-01-10 18:25 |
不過我認為梁生應安排其二仔去入讀一間有殺校危機的Band 3小學, 才能感受一下民眾的疾苦. Quote:原帖由 hui916 於 11-1-10 18:17 發表 梁生自九十代初開始已被委任為教育統籌委員會主席, 整個香港教育制度的改革, 這二十年來香港教育系統的翻天覆地, 包括三三四, 都是他一手策劃出來. 雖然他脫離了公職, 但他對教育可能仍然有情意結, 所以想給三個子女 ... |
kenmay | 2011-01-10 18:31 |
Support x 2 Quote:原帖由 hui916 於 11-1-10 18:25 發表 不過我認為梁生應安排其二仔去入讀一間有殺校危機的Band 3小學, 才能感受一下民眾的疾苦. |
kenmay | 2011-01-10 18:38 |
GoodGrief | 2011-01-10 19:05 |
我想提出另一觀點。 梁錦松先生和伏明霞女士是“公眾人物”,這是事實,他們不能改變這點。若學校因他們的名人身份而收了他們的子女,這是他們的問題還是學校的問題? 若梁先生真的“走後門”,但是收定唔收梁先生的子女的決定權在學校,那麼,誰人應負更多的責任? 社會多是批評高官將子女送到國際學校或外國讀書,為甚麼梁先生將子女送到直資學校,如一般香港中產家庭,也要受到批評?真的要梁先生將子女送到Band 3 才會不受批評嗎?但我想問,那一位香港家長會這樣做呢?己多不欲,勿施於人。 |
ANChan59 | 2011-01-10 19:10 |
Student123 | 2011-01-10 19:19 |
Please stop the atmopshere of attacking. If he didn't show up during the briefing & interview process & get admitted to DBSPD, BK Parents will attack in another version, right? If he send his son to international school, also will be attacked in another version. If he send his son to LS or st Jos or WY (subsidised schools), another version of attack will be there. Kids & his wife done nothing wrong. Even Mr. Leung's fault was already past tense. |
kenmay | 2011-01-10 19:32 |
appleycma | 2011-01-10 20:33 |
HoHoMom | 2011-01-10 20:42 |
Wait, isn't he the one who pushed so hard for school to use "mother tongue" to teach back in the days of Tung Chi Wah ? If that is true, why is he putting his son in an English school now ? So other ppl's children should learn in mother tongue (i.e. cantonese) while his children should learn in English ? |