| sadsam | 2011-01-11 09:54 |
| caa | 2011-01-11 11:05 |
| sadsam | 2011-01-11 11:29 |
| 真係好sad架。:igiveup: |
| sadsam | 2011-01-11 11:32 |
| 係囉，應該仲要試下唔同既banding，由第一身家長既親身感受最好不過。名校要試，就殺既校都要試，殺唔死既也要試。 Quote:原帖由 hui916 於 11-1-10 18:25 發表  不過我認為梁生應安排其二仔去入讀一間有殺校危機的Band 3小學, 才能感受一下民眾的疾苦. |
| judy | 2011-01-11 12:55 |
| Quote:I don't think so, because when he promoted the educational reform(s), he didn't have kids yet. He promoted any non-sense and he wouldn't the receiving end in the past. Now, he is the player, a father and fully understand the importance of education and the quality of traditional famous elite school. I can guarantee he won't send his kids to Pui Kiu, International schools, and some new approaches DSS.... 我想問吓，拔褲，唔係教改之產物麽？教改的其中一項，就係鼓勵拆墙鬆。提供更多選擇。有人喜歡培僑那類學校，有人喜歡拔褲較傳统喲，各花入各眼。所有進步社會無不如此。何 non-sense之有呢？ |
| HoHoMom | 2011-01-11 20:38 |
| But your logic is far funnier. And the question isthe what's so sad about stating objective facts ?:question: :unknown: |
| HoHoMom | 2011-01-11 20:44 |
| PoorParent | 2011-01-11 21:23 |
| 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 |
| happyland001 | 2011-01-12 00:02 |
| 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 |
| Zhaiba | 2011-01-12 00:04 |
| Is it so difficult to understand? The government set policy which it thinks is best for the general public but there is no policy which can possibly satisfy everyone. The official definitely have their rights to choose what they think are best for them which may not be suitable for the general public, or what the government cannot provide. e.g. most of the parents want to send their kids to DXS (or whatever elite school they want), can the government change all the government school to the elite school? No! no government can possibly do that so why keep critising this man who is just a parent like us who want to give a better education to his kid......that is the sad thing. |
更多選校、升學及教育心得討論內容
