babyso | 2009-01-20 13:40 |
不如大家係度交流下 ar :yummy : |
babyso | 2009-01-21 10:00 |
我係 web site 見到以下資料 : ”09/10學年自行收生競爭情:學額:170(遞交申請表格人數1500) ” 大家有其他資料, 不妨都post 出來分享 ar 又或者你仲係心大心細, 未 sure 係唔係度讀, 都請你分享一下原因, 等我地知多一 d ar, thanks! |
kyliema2006 | 2009-01-21 11:04 |
1,500申請表?三年前都是得1,200申請表。學費咁貴,一般人應不會選之為大包圍的對象,除非對學校完全不認識啦!不過,學校已經有六、七年歷史,多了人認識也說不定! |
Nicolelau | 2009-01-22 16:53 |
babyso, Hello, 你喺唔喺已經決定讀CKY? 點解? 我仲有些15/16, 可否分享吓!!!:unknown: |
curry123 | 2009-01-22 23:52 |
俊賢 | 2009-01-23 00:20 |
mimia810 | 2009-01-23 06:59 |
I'll 99% take CKY for my daughter too. The same concern as yours. In addition, I myself quite like goodhope too as their new campus is very nice and the same religion as ours. But my the most need for my daughter is she's always happy and its most likely that she can achieve with studying in CKY than any other schools she's on hand. I'm still a bit struggling on money if she's successfully drawn Maryknoll or St. Mary in government's system. Lets see. Afterall, my husband and I are really impressed by the principle and thought CKY is a really good school. |
babyso | 2009-01-23 09:03 |
LydiaWong | 2009-01-28 20:28 |
Hi, I'm still considering if I should choose CKY for my son, although I'm 90% sure. I like CKY very much but my husband is a bit concern about the high school fee and it's still a relatively new school without knowing about the reputation from gradutaes. My son has been accepted by KTS and CKY which are totally 2 different styles , so not easy to decide. |
俊賢 | 2009-01-29 03:00 |
其實, 選讀任何一間採活動教學的小學, 初期都會面對一項兩難的局面, 就是心裡會比較採用傳統vs採活動教學的小學, 將來熟是熟非? 壓力太大時, 對小朋友並非好事, 一旦面對唔到挫折, 一時想不通輕生了, 悔之已晚...; 若完全沒有壓力, 如果小朋友不主動參與, 到最後會否一事無成, 甚至訓練到更加面對不到壓力... 我選CKY的理由比較膚淺, 我有時都想不通傳統教學模式及主題探究式的活動教學模式那個較好, 越想就越容易鑽牛角尖, 所以, 就深信一個假設, 當然有很大冒險成份, 現在很多直資及私校, 都採取活動教學模式, 特別是在政府未叫停前, 很多直資還聲稱會行IB, 起碼, 出名的如St.Paul Co-edu, DBSPD 等都打算行IB, 咁多教育界頂尖校長都曾經考慮採用此模式, 即使政府推行的新高中(334)會考, 都被評為抄考IB, ... 至少, 在理論層面上, 擬似IB的活動教學模式理應佔優, 官津學校不是全面推行只是因為資源問題, 最近12年免費教育及推行小班, 都是教育團體(如教協等)爭取多年, 政府經政治考慮的妥協吧了, 政府如打正旗號, 全面中小學行小班, 行活動教學, 相信資源亦未必足以應付, 所以, 我相信, 直資及優質私校的概念, 就是政府用來轉嫁成本的工具, 因為, 政府需要人才是不爭的事實, 但在官津校收回成本是沒有可能, 唯有打造一些更好的學校, 等家長自己負擔所需的差額, 即直資學校, 按人頭資助, 以官津的人均成本計, 而直資學校再收取的學費, 就是購買優質服務的差價. 我就是基於以上的假設, 選取相關的學校, 問題是, 我們不會三五七年即時見到結果, 而且, 學校本身是否能把崇高的教育理念落實到, 得到預期的效果, 又是另一個問題, 因此, 我們作為家長, 要協助子女, 配合學校的方針, 不是放底子女給學校就希望得到收成, 想信, 雖然未必是最好的選擇, 即子女未必是在學術上最有料, 但只要做到劉校長所說, CKY是要訓練到小朋友才德兼備, 我已經是心滿意足了. 我在小一選校討論區見到有人轉載了一篇報導的連結: 兩種教育 ![]() http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/081116/3/99vc.html . . . Quote:原帖由 LydiaWong 於 09-1-28 20:28 發表 ![]() Hi, I'm still considering if I should choose CKY for my son, although I'm 90% sure. I like CKY very much but my husband is a bit concern about the high school fee and it's still a relatively new schoo ...
[ 本帖最後由 俊賢 於 09-1-29 03:18 編輯 ] |