DS1 | 2007-11-06 10:36 |
Dear all, We don't know exactly what had happened. So, it is hard to make any comments. However, what Mr. Yau wanted to do was to help to improve the school bus service. In this respect, we need to give him full support. |
小兒兒 | 2007-11-06 11:35 |
咁學生剪報, 返到學校要介紹及和一班同學公開分享算唔算違返版權, 會比人告嗎? 死啦, 怕仔仔被人告呀!? 咁你quote【蘋果日報訊】全名又算唔算係bk出廣告呢? |
軒Mother | 2007-11-06 11:51 |
以後見到老先生嘅發表,唔好答嘴, 等佢自己講哂,等佢做孤獨老人 |
KenBaBa | 2007-11-06 14:04 |
老狐狸 | 2007-11-06 22:25 |
報章上的每一篇文章及每一幀照片均獨立享有版權,所以只複製報章上一篇文章,已可能構成侵犯版權。整份報章,作為作品的匯集,亦獨立享有版權。版權亦存在於已發表的報章的排印編排。 [知識產權署] 香港《版權條例》規定,在事先未取得作者或出版商許可的情況下,複製有版權保護的著作超過一個合理使用的限度便是違法的。 [香港版權影印授權協會] 「學生剪報, 返到學校要介紹及和一班同學公開分享算」,沒有複製報章,沒有違返版權法! 另外、非牟利教育機構影印印刷作品指引是就有關在非牟利教育機構服務的老師,需要為教學的目的影印印刷作品,提供指示。 |
deniset | 2007-11-07 09:09 |
KenBaBa | 2007-11-07 11:30 |
Dear 老狐狸: Thank you very much for your info which is very important and useful. From now on we got to observe and be vigilant. |
武航 | 2007-11-25 09:57 |
數年前政府修改版權法時新聞介別有好大迴響,認為會嚴重影響新聞運作,但,法例仍然生效!! 但,萍果日報於法例生效當日刊出全版聲明,為抗議新例及捍衛新聞自由,永久授權任何人隨意轉載所有該報撰寫的新聞。 |