| ANChan59 | 2013-04-17 12:42 |
| 回復 HKTHK 的帖子
不能分組，因為部份是多過一個原因！ 你有好題目，我只是搭咀，其他人加入，好玩自然多人參與，希望唔好又有「高人」走入嚟！:unknown: |
| ChiChiPaPa | 2013-04-17 12:45 |
| 不是不補習的高分，只是高分的不用補習。
|
| Annie123 | 2013-04-17 13:27 |
| 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 |
| annie40 | 2013-04-17 15:04 |
| 回復 ChiChiPaPa 的帖子
不是不補習的高分，只是高分的不用補習。 *** **** 还有高分的还去補習, 有数个可能的结果: 1) 浪费时间,没影响分数.. 2) 補左分数好少少, 3) 因为没时间做其他思考功夫, 反而低分左 |
| ANChan59 | 2013-04-17 15:52 |
我知啦！
追女仔或者追男仔！
 |
| ANChan59 | 2013-04-17 16:13 |
| 還有避開黑白天鵝。
|
| slamai | 2013-04-17 16:18 |
| 回復 HKTHK 的帖子
It's good to confirm at least that 補習 is not a prerequisite for good reading ability. For a more rigorous research on the effect of 補習 on reading ability, a batch of randomly selected students who don't 補習 before are separated into two groups so that one group add 補習 to their study/reading routine for a sufficient length of time while the other (control) group continue their study/reading routine without 補習. On the other hand, a batch of randomly selected students who use to 補習 before are separated into two groups so that one (control) group continue to have 補習 in their study/reading routine while the other group stop to have 補習 in their study/reading routine for a sufficient length of time. At the end of the research, the reading ability of the two groups of students with and without 補習 is compared. |
| HKTHK | 2013-04-17 16:25 |
| [i=s] 本帖最後由 HKTHK 於 13-4-17 16:26 編輯 [/i]
回復 slamai 的帖子 LOL, should we get a group to do this, any volunteers? |
| Yanamami | 2013-04-17 16:27 |
| 上writing class算不算補習？ |
| Yanamami | 2013-04-17 16:52 |
| HKTHK Are you trying to have a better writer or get a higher grade? ************************* So it depends on the intention, right? How about just to get more practice in writing?:wahaha: |
更多選校、升學及教育心得討論內容
