| kyliema2006 | 2008-11-11 09:55 |
| TINGMUM | 2008-11-11 10:35 |
| kyliema2006, 多謝你的分享 及解答!:good: :-D |
| kyliema2006 | 2008-11-11 10:41 |
| kaifu | 2008-11-11 11:15 |
| papa_pop | 2008-11-12 18:27 |
| Kaifu, I think CKY is kind of following the UK system - similar to the previous (or existing) arrangements with some of British-based international schools in HK, eg, ESF. Why is it so? I guess it's due primarily to the backgrounds of the leaders - principals, and the historic reasons of the HK ed system. Far as I know, IGCSE is 'optional', providing students a chance to use the exam results for further studies overseas BEFORE they opt to pursue IB in HK. One might compare it to those UK schools which do not give up GCE while going for IBD. When you said "everybody else" taking one exam only from 2012 on, I guess you refer to those under the local system (NSS). But there are schools/students who still opt for IGCSE. As you may know, there are some who haven't put their full faith in IB. As for your question on having just a couple of teachers teaching 'all' subjects. In fact, there aren't many subjects in primary. Some schools only have four subjects: Chinese, English, Maths and General Studies; in other words, they have at most four different teachers to teach them these core subjects. While for my kid's class, he has three teachers teaching him. Think it's fine and it's not uncommon for primary schools. Nonetheless, I trust you have good reasons not to submit your application for your kid. Good luck. |
| siuchun88 | 2008-11-12 20:38 |
| This is perhaps a rather special phenomenon in Hong Kong that a number of new schools declare to adopt IB. Neither do they have any track record in running IB, nor even have any particular experience in providing 'traditional' curriculum. What they claim to offer 5-year primary and 6-year middle year is because their students are much more capable than others. If it is so, their students must have got the admission long before the school was established! First GCSE, then IB, but intentionally avoid HKCEE or HKAL or the new 334 exam. The only reason for this kind of arrangement is to show the parents, who aspire to this school, that this is not a local school for ordinary students but a talented school for 'guinea pig'. I have no intention to hurt anybody, but it does, please accept my deep apology. |
| kaifu | 2008-11-12 22:16 |
| kyliema2006 | 2008-11-13 09:34 |
| 每間學校定位不同,興幸現在選擇比以前的多,各取所需,毋”對”或”不對”。 反而,現在教育改革為334,以通識教學,與身邊的親戚朋友傾談時,他們大表無奈,無奈在於無所適從、無奈在於師資訓練不足、無奈在於仍然摸不透遊戲規則。十年前提倡的母語教學,弄到滿城風雨,今天終告失敗。未來的新學制,同一年會有兩屆的預科畢業生爭大學學位,說到底,大家都是guinea pig。 這篇報度比較全面,亦道出了新學制及IB的問題,僅供參考。 http://www.com.cuhk.edu.hk/ubeat/070478/ib.html 負責中大新聞與傳播學院非聯招學生入學事宜的馮應謙教授表示,高考課程是英國模式,較易被海外大學承認,但轉為「三三四」後,香港中學文憑考試的程度並不等同A Level或O Level,暫時未有一認可標準,IB則是一個國際認可的標準。 世界各地的教育制度都有不善之處,祇能根據個人不同的期望,物色各自理想學校喇。 Quote:原帖由 siuchun88 於 08-11-12 20:38 發表 ![]() This is perhaps a rather special phenomenon in Hong Kong that a number of new schools declare to adopt IB. Neither do they have any track record in running IB, nor even have any particular experience ...
[ 本帖最後由 kyliema2006 於 08-11-13 10:32 編輯 ] |
| loy211 | 2008-11-13 09:41 |
| 蔡繼有是否行IB? |
| kyliema2006 | 2008-11-13 09:58 |
| 蔡繼有計劃Year 12考IBD,Year 10考IGCSE,這個方向一直都未曾改變。蔡繼有現時最高的一級是Year 8,但仍未正式為IBO成員,因為有關的maintenance fee高昂,為減輕負擔,會待明年/後年始作申請,應該2013年會有第一屆IBD畢業生。 Quote:原帖由 loy211 於 08-11-13 09:41 發表 ![]() 蔡繼有是否行IB? |