| ryanyui | 2008-11-13 10:13 | 
| dont worry too much! cos when our children grow up, hk education system may change more than 10 times! so the advantage of ib is that it seems not change in the future! haha! cky is a school for those parents include me feel disapointed with hk govt and hk ed system! | 
| kaifu | 2008-11-13 10:55 | 
| ryanyui | 2008-11-13 11:16 | 
| kaifu | 2008-11-13 11:29 | 
| ryanyui | 2008-11-13 11:37 | 
| kaifu | 2008-11-13 12:47 | 
| TaoTaoMa | 2008-11-13 18:24 | 
| (IB)一個外國認可的考試,我覺得不論10年後,香港的大學會預留多少的學位給些學生,但我們不得不承認,現今香港的教育制度是非常失敗,朝令夕改,無所適從(會考竟然問『屈機』),我希望送我的小朋友到蔡繼有這些學校,完全沒有做白老鼠的感覺,相反,任由小朋友就現今的教育制度照單全收,父母與小朋友都一定要付出很大很大的努力,並且承擔極大的壓力,才能有機會踏入香港幾間名大學,這條路絕對不容易行!我相信政府係明白嘅,但根深蒂固的官僚制度,那個高官敢一刀切在教育制度上大改…但佢地又肯俾咁多錢去支助蔡繼有這些『優質學校』,所以我才覺得他的展望很好,至少在同類型的學校中,我估他應該是最好的!最後值得一提係,SPCC同DBS都會有IB試的選擇,傳統名校,我相信他們亦不會浪費資源投資在一班在香港沒有競爭力上香港大學的學生上,對嗎? | 
| curry123 | 2008-11-13 22:03 | 
| Totally agree with you. Quote:原帖由 TaoTaoMa 於 08-11-13 18:24 發表  (IB)一個外國認可的考試,我覺得不論10年後,香港的大學會預留多少的學位給些學生,但我們不得不承認,現今香港的教育制度是非常失敗,朝令夕改,無所適從(會考竟然問『屈機』),我希望送我的小朋友到蔡繼有這些學校,完全沒有做白老鼠的 ... | 
| kyliema2006 | 2008-11-14 09:40 | 
| 其實現時的334學制,提倡以通識教學,不再死讀書的做法,有點類似IB理念。這個改革本質是好,但要將孩子的邏輯思維提升之餘,更需提升教師的質素,拼棄傳統教學方法,學校亦需調整校風以之配合,家庭更需具備求知精神。改革祇是口號,要成功落實,所花的資源其實是非常浩大的,成敗與否,唯有拭目以待。 真人真事一則,每到考試時間,媽媽級的同事們都會積極為孩子備試,最難最難捉模的一科就是通識科,除了考起學生們之外,家長們對這一科都顯得特別戰戰競競。終於試題出了,一條小四程度的問題:「為何石油氣的價格升幅會比汽油的多?」自問真的無本事答。 | 
| papa_pop | 2008-11-14 12:51 | 
| kaifu, you don't really need to give up.  It's just different people have different views and perspectives.  As kyliema said, there's no 'right' or 'wrong' in some of the arguments. I gather the primary difference stems from the different planning for the kid's studies. To be honest, if one only eyes on local universities, CKY stands no better chance than most local schools. What CKY is embracing is a more flexible and, hopefully, more international, education. You have rightly pointed out that it does have financial implications on the part of parents. Fingers crossed. |