[i=s] 本帖最後由 Doray 於 16-6-10 18:25 編輯 [/i]
Quote:Bettylau 發表於 16-6-10 09:38
咪玩啦, 其他讚好咁行貨, GOOD , VERY GOOD, 有愛心.....之類 一睇就知係槍手或家長吹捧自己打啦, 最致 ...
If as you said, "我唔係對呢間學校有偏見, 無利益亦無話識人讀所以心存偏幫" , how could you firmly say the bad comments 講中校內發生事件 and "睇見內部問題已經浮上水面" while all the good comments were fake? If the good comments are not from parents, where should be the truth source of the good comments?? Should I regard all bad comments re
培僑 from this same website link were truthworthy and therefore suggesting other not to consider because of these comments.
"其他話校長無得做 , 梗係話佢退休比個下台階人啦" This is a vague comment which could be applied to all cases of retirement of any headmaster in HK. If your logic is corrent, should I interpret the ex DBS retired headmaster who is now setting up another school as he is 無得做. Actually, 培僑 also has 3 headmasters during past 10 years. So should I consider this school is having too many politics and internal power struggling issues?!
I agreed with you that 作為家長多加考慮亦無妨 but only for I mentioned in other posts before, WKF is quite different from other subsidy school and if you buy traditional school type, don't choose it or you will be frustrated.
.
|
