| mimwing | 2025-07-19 10:19 |
| Quote:Sing13 發表於 25-7-19 00:52 其實今年終極狀元外表都唔覺特別醒,但已經為學校光耀門楣了。 至於QC,唔使比啦,直逼女拔,同第二集團馬 ... QC成績最多排全港20-30, 直逼女拔真係笑左。。332+ 有冇90%? |
| KikiDaddy | 2025-07-19 10:43 |
| [i=s] 本帖最後由 KikiDaddy 於 25-7-19 10:44 編輯 [/i]
回覆 mimwing 的帖子 If you look at the number of 5*/5** they got, you will know how good they are. QC Chinese 5+ % this year is over 40%, this is more than double of other Band 1A boys' schools. It is truly phenomenal! |
| Poyau | 2025-07-19 11:29 |
| Sing13 | 2025-07-19 11:33 |
| 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 |
| cafeva | 2025-07-19 11:36 |
| Quote:Poyau 發表於 25-7-19 11:29 DSE 2025 -------------------------------------------------------- DGS(女) | 皇仁(男) 有無比較埋**,樓上話QC**好勁 |
| _oo_ | 2025-07-19 11:48 |
| Quote:Poyau 發表於 25-7-18 12:53 皇仁(男)2025年文憑試成績 -------------------------------------------------------- 考生 107人 |
| mcl233 | 2025-07-19 12:00 |
呢個世界做分析,原來一樣野叫做假如?假如建基於乜東東?假如女生體能上係同男生一樣?假如女生學術取向和男生一樣?咁呢,男生和女生結果就係咁咁咁,呢啲分析過唔過到自己㗎?
做分析,乜唔係先要建基於本身同一條件下,忽然走個建築公司Vs飲食業,假如大家都係100人~~ :wahaha:![]() |
| cafeva | 2025-07-19 12:02 |
| DG Vs QC 都已經夠哂創新:happy: |
| dreamdream081 | 2025-07-19 12:10 |
| Quote:猴子爸 發表於 25-7-18 11:57 QC CEM5+随时返回第三。 |
| KikiDaddy | 2025-07-19 12:13 |
| [i=s] 本帖最後由 KikiDaddy 於 25-7-19 12:16 編輯 [/i]
回覆 cafeva 的帖子 I said QC is good is comparing to other boys' schools. I am not trying to do DGS vs QC.:happy: Having said that DGS should still have a better 5*/5** rate in Eng and Chinese while QC Maths and Science electives should be as good as if not better than DGS. |