| mcl233 | 2025-07-25 10:14 |
| Quote:cafeva 發表於 25-7-25 09:49 做乜叉開話題. 自修生數目幾何級數咁上要正視 |
| KikiDaddy | 2025-07-25 10:15 |
| [i=s] 本帖最後由 KikiDaddy 於 25-7-25 10:18 編輯 [/i]
回覆 retriever 的帖子 HK have 12 years of free education so it is fair for all the students receive the same amount of government funding in respect of DSS or Aided school. My question is how this 2.33 x tuition fees cap is set? To me this cap is excessive and unnessary. It is perfectly fine for DSS schools to provide quality and diversified education to suit the needs of some parents. However, how can it justify DSS schools to enjoy full autonomy in student selection while they receive full subsidy from government at the same time? The interview process can easily deprive the chance of children with less family resources to enter these quality DSS schools, particularly in P1. |
| cafeva | 2025-07-25 10:17 |
| [i=s] 本帖最後由 cafeva 於 25-7-25 10:19 編輯 [/i]
Quote:mcl233 發表於 25-7-25 10:14 改少少咪得囉,自修生必行NJ條路入大學~ 加埋NJ 要set quota. by subject. :excited: |
| mcl233 | 2025-07-25 10:21 |
| Quote:cafeva 發表於 25-7-25 10:17 加埋NJ 要set quota. by subject. |
| poonseelai | 2025-07-25 10:23 |
| Quote:KikiDaddy 發表於 25-7-25 10:15
回覆 retriever 的帖子 HK have 12 years of free education so it is fair for all the students receive ... |
| KikiDaddy | 2025-07-25 10:29 |
| 回覆 retriever 的帖子
Sorry for the confusion. Funding here means government subsidy plus tuition fees from parents. |
| PTL_L | 2025-07-25 10:37 |
| Quote:mcl233 發表於 25-7-25 10:21 本帖最後由 mcl233 於 25-7-25 10:22 編輯 一野ko,唔經聯招報大學,簡單又明白,75%比J,25%比NJ, ... 發夢冇咁早,有議員提出50/50呀 |
| cafeva | 2025-07-25 10:40 |
| [i=s] 本帖最後由 cafeva 於 25-7-25 10:42 編輯 [/i]
Quote:PTL_L 發表於 25-7-25 10:37 發夢冇咁早,有議員提出50/50呀 咩議員? 大陸議員呀! 50/50都可以, 最緊要by subject. 只要set 好個數, 唔好年年搬龍門. D人自然識走位 |
| mcl233 | 2025-07-25 11:05 |
| Quote:PTL_L 發表於 25-7-25 10:37 發夢冇咁早,有議員提出50/50呀 |
| mcl233 | 2025-07-25 11:07 |
| Quote:cafeva 發表於 25-7-25 10:40
咩議員? 大陸議員呀! 50/50都可以, 最緊要by subject. 只要set 好個數, 唔好年年搬龍門. D人自然識走位 ... |