| cafeva | 2025-07-25 11:09 |
| [i=s] 本帖最後由 cafeva 於 25-7-25 11:11 編輯 [/i]
Quote:mcl233 發表於 25-7-25 11:07 其實冇用的,剔走4XXX個,又可能趕返4XXX個本土海外制學生返DSE,又係bingo~ ... 唔會啦. 人地要思考訓練. 要外國升學呀... :happy: |
| retriever | 2025-07-25 11:10 |
| cafeva | 2025-07-25 11:14 |
| Quote:retriever 發表於 25-7-25 11:10 正視左啦... 北方補習社正視左自修生問題, 所以佢地已在香港"借殼上市" 建立日校... 佢地係好快, 有錢賺呀. 又有佢的議員幫手.. 不過香港只係1年可以咩? |
| retriever | 2025-07-25 11:30 |
| Quote:mcl233 發表於 25-7-25 11:07 其實冇用的,剔走4XXX個,又可能趕返4XXX個本土海外制學生返DSE,又係bingo~ ... "相煎何太急" 問題不在學制, 而在資助學位的限額... 諗下如何減低外來既"本土生" 好過啦! |
| retriever | 2025-07-25 11:41 |
| retriever | 2025-07-25 11:53 |
| poonseelai | 2025-07-25 11:59 |
| Quote:cafeva 發表於 25-7-25 11:14 佢地係好快, 有錢賺呀. 又有佢的議員幫手.. 不過香港只係1年可以咩? |
| KikiDaddy | 2025-07-25 12:12 |
| 回覆 retriever 的帖子
We should look for equity instead of equality. I'm not saying it is wrong for the DSS schools to get more resources for their students. However, it us our government's responsibility to maintain a policy equity for all the schools and students regarding the public spending and upward mobility. Just like we believe a clear definition for local student is required before our government promote DSE to the mainland and other countries. |
| PTL_L | 2025-07-25 12:30 |
| Quote:cafeva 發表於 25-7-25 10:40 咩議員? 大陸議員呀! 50/50都可以, 最緊要by subject. 只要set 好個數, 唔好年年搬龍門. D人自然識走位 ... |
| poonseelai | 2025-07-25 12:39 |