eviepa | 2011-01-13 22:40 |
ANChan59 香港剛出生的334制,對有志升讀英國3223模式的大學的學生會有困擾。可能你因此會覺得不快,不好意思。 對此海外留學,我所知甚少。不過我有以下的角度,不知同意否: 1. 一向英國大學都歧視香港學生 — 現在英國高考的總體得A率大概是27%。香港高考的成績比例我不知,但相信沒有一科是C或以上加起來有27%的。即是說,隨時一個考得三個C的港生,實力比英國三A生為強。這尤以理科更為明顯。但不要說三個C,聽說英國大學prefer英國的三個A多過香的三個B。 2. 留學不單止英國,還有美國等許多國家,這些國家是334的,香港學生無論用會考或是用高考成績去報讀,都是處於不利位置。334可以有效改善這個情況。 當然,初生有陣痛,而且痛的是頭你的子女,我同情。 eviepa |
ANChan59 | 2011-01-13 23:19 |
eviepa You always have a wrong impression on me as a die-hard supporter of HKAL, I explained more than one time, but you never listen. Yes, my wife and I studied in UK, but we are pretty open-mined in education. My son's first summer program in Australia(G4), then USA (G6), UK (G9).... we enourage wider exposure and analyse different systems for our boy. I need to be humble and I am not good enough to comment on those systems. May be you know more than us. In UK, for top notch universities well consider HKAL, but they feel uncomfortable about HKDSE (Oxbridge). Their admission officers strongly recommended us either go for feeder school in UK or IB in HK. That's why we consider IB even I am not sure my son eligible to have an interview or not (Oxbridge). But, I and he didn't want to sit for so many examinations on top of HKDSE, GCE AL, SAT, AP etc. for overseas education. Your point number 1 is partial valid, British discriminate other races and nationalities, just enjoy French, Scotish and Irish jokes. But Cambridge well appreciates the HKAL results as our Cs ~ to GCE As. Our 3As much much better than GCE-AL 3As, better preference in admission. Your pt no.2 is nothing to do with my case as I explained in first paragraph. Don't complicated with 334 and 523 arguement again. ANChan59 [ 本帖最後由 ANChan59 於 11-1-15 00:13 編輯 ] |
eviepa | 2011-01-13 23:49 |
AnChan59, 道聽途說過一些IB理念,印象是一個很好的program,預祝你孩子成功修讀IB,日後找到一間好大學。 IB有多年的經歷,而且是成功的經驗,國際性的認受性自然高,修讀這課程必定好。但我預測,日後文憑試在國際的認受性也不會很低。假以時日。 eviepa |
ANChan59 | 2011-01-14 23:07 |
Quote:原帖由 eviepa 於 11-1-13 23:49 發表 IB有多年(Over 60 yrs)的經歷,而且是成功的經驗,國際性的認受性自然高,修讀這課程必定好。 Finally, you get my point. Good luck to your daughter. |
ChiChiPaPa | 2011-01-15 09:19 |
ANChan59 | 2011-01-15 20:53 |
我覺得文憑試其實不淺,文憑試的學生是可以同時應考其他公開考試。部份科目和其他國際試的範圍差別不大,應考其他國際試所付出的額外時間不會多很多,但可減少一試定生死的問題,和加強報海外大學的籌碼。 Why HKDSE instead of HKCEE & HKALE? Reduce the examination pressure and no. of exam. of the students. Am I correct? Why more exam????? 我希望將來會有學校或教育機構為文憑試的學生開辦美國的 AP 課程,尤其是數學和經濟科,這將有助文憑試的尖子取得美國大學的學位。 My son got some AP credit in maths from EPGY. 目前已有學校幫學生報 IGCSE,例如優才、聖保祿學校,不過,IGCSE 的深度不及 AP。對有實力的文憑試考生,AP 應是更好的挑戰。 More examinations ....... another way to reduce the popularity of HKDSE again. I highly regard the smartness of the principal of those school. 政府也應努力為文憑試取得內地的認可,以提升文憑試的價值。其實過往的香港考試已取得英美澳大學承認,文憑試要取得她們的認可只是時間問題。相反香港的考試過往得不到內地知名大學的認可,文憑試是可打開這升學通道,為香港學生提供更廣闊的出路。 HKEAA - in the process to negotiate with China Examination/Education Bureau . |
ChiChiPaPa | 2011-01-16 09:05 |
ANChan59 | 2011-01-16 11:43 |
Thanks for your sharing in public exams issues. You made a good point for primary and secondary importance of different exams for different students. Good discussion..... Amazingly, my son did convince me - focus, focus, focus..... single exam if possible. |
easy | 2011-01-16 12:01 |
ANChan59 | 2011-01-16 13:35 |