kunggi201 | 2007-07-16 10:44 |
kunggi201 | 2007-07-16 10:55 |
Quote:原文章由 voasia 於 07-7-14 15:47 發表 最近因為比較忙,很少上來說話,剛才看到了很多家長們的留言,也是頗有感慨.我們學校的家長其實根本就是社會的中流砥柱:大多是中產階層,公務員,或者是小康家庭.我們賺錢不多,但是最願意把錢花在孩子們的身上,往往孩 ... voasia 我因工作的關係,與政府各大部門經常接觸 政府的施政思維方式,主要是要行政方便,唔好背鑊 在教育方面,總之人人有書讀 總之我年年有好數據,幾多%派到頭三志願就向市民交功課了 那管你派去那一間學校呢 你不讀政府學校是你的事,與政府何關呢? |
kunggi201 | 2007-07-16 11:10 |
補充: 有一次坐的士 收音機正訪問FS有關徵收銷售稅的諮詢 (我個人是不贊成開徵銷售稅) 的士司機說:「開徵銷售稅,我地的小市民就慘啦!」 我說:「我同意你的講法,不過我想問,你有冇交稅架?」 的士司機說:「我地租車既,日搵日清,邊有錢交稅丫!」 我說:「司機大佬,你依家用緊的馬路,是政府起的和維修的,你唔交稅,政府又點維修?冇馬路,你地又點搵食呢?」 的士司機說:「d有錢人搵咁多,交多d稅都應該家嘛!」 香港有大約二百萬勞動人口,交稅的是少過一半 既有大半「奉旨」食政府的人 你估政府會唔會得罪呢班大半數? 有咩事,就只會向我們中產開刀啦 政府的行政思維和的士司機一樣: 「你地有錢,有得選擇,派唔好咪讀私校囉!」 [ 本文章最後由 kunggi201 於 07-7-16 14:22 編輯 ] |
owenmami | 2007-07-16 11:45 |
waltermama | 2007-07-17 00:19 |
yeah, totally agree w/ u la.... |
waltermama | 2007-07-17 00:27 |
waltermama | 2007-07-17 00:29 |
kunggi201 | 2007-07-17 09:24 |
papa_pop | 2007-07-17 11:17 |
Even now, I don't think CKY would be voted as a top 10 school. But I agree with Kunggi's view that it might not be a consideration for some CKY parents - otherwise, they are likely to opt for other, more popular schools. Some people would consider our kids at CKY as guinea pigs as the 'results' are yet to see. True that it might take at least another five or six years to prove it. Now that a year has gone, I'm happy with my kid's growth so far at CKY. In fact, I did note that some of his classmates are doing great too. This is especially so when it comes to learning languages. I guess their spoken levels are (if not above) on a par with some of the elite schools, their writing skills might not be as good though. Well, they have four more years to hone their skills in preparation for the Y5 thesis. P.S. Fair to say that CKY is among the top 10 in terms of fees for non-international schools. |
voasia | 2007-07-24 02:57 |
作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 |