sinot | 2006-08-29 14:59 |
just in case you haven't heard of this before http://www.mingpaohealth.com/cfm/family3.cfm?File=20041130/toddler/yma1.txt you can read the comment about the book "The sound of a miracle" in amazon http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0964483815/sr=8-1/qid=1156833858/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-9557436-4515927?ie=UTF8 and also the website of the mother http://www.georgianainstitute.org/index.htm |
babytszkin | 2006-08-29 23:46 |
我想問下呢,咁多位媽媽您們的小朋友有做過E院提供(池力供震)檢查嗎?有用嗎?今日個兒科e生話驚我仔個腦有退化引致講說話能力慢(因亞仔細過時跌過個頭仔)我有d擔心! |
hinhinmummy | 2006-08-30 09:33 |
babytszkin 我個仔做完評估時做過, 見埋遺傳科抽血染驗色體, 跟住就話所有report都搵吾到佢係自閉症的原因(意料中事), 但既然醫生suggest左叫你小朋友去做, 有無用都好(雖然都知自閉症係搵吾到原因), 但做左好似安樂d |
pamam | 2006-08-30 10:23 |
just wonder how do they decide who has to do all these tests. I know another global developmental delayed kid has to do 池力供震 too, but they have never asked my son to do any type of tests. Anyone knows why? |
babytszkin | 2006-08-30 22:03 |
THX~HINHINMUMMY |
jasper888 | 2006-08-30 22:42 |
As far as I know, if there is a regression in ability or if the delay is very significant, the doctor is more likely to do more tests to find out causes / causes that may be treatable. |
pamam | 2006-08-31 09:07 |
Thanks, Jasper888. |
奀豬mami~~ | 2006-09-04 01:54 |
頭先同豬仔去食飯,豬仔扭計,要爸爸抱抱,坐我地後面既一家人,成日眼望望,我初時都有同佢地禮貌咁打招呼,但係後來我地一家出一次聲,後面果位媽媽就望過黎一次,眼神係SUPER歧視,仲大大聲話我個仔講野好古怪,好唔正常既細路仔 :sm: :sm: :sm: :sm: 佢大聲到係專登比豬仔聽到,豬仔即時好唔開心,要走,豬仔4歲都未到,講野唔正都好正常姐,仲咩有咁既亞媽架,要拎人黎取笑架,佢地一家人講完人就hehe哈哈,完全唔理人感受,hurt我好啦,仲咩要咁難為小朋友呀 :angryfire: :angryfire: :angryfire: :angryfire: |
Justin2002 | 2006-09-04 09:04 |
奀豬mami, You are already a self-controlled person, if I were you, I do not know what I shall do! Can't imagine that how they teach their own children? That's why there are so many so called 'educated' people in this world who have no sympathy and consideration at all! :angryfire: Justin2002 |
gigi2 | 2006-09-04 09:25 |
奀豬mami, I think I will retort the 'eight' woman! In some circumstances, I am not the easy guy especially when I fight for my children!!!@! :angryfire: :angryfire: :sm: :sm: |